And just now, grog krunt refers to a writer that can continue a fictional account of parliamentry proceedings.
This is guilt, deflection of their guilt by using ridicule.
If I am wrong, I seriously doubt that those in authority, the guilty ones, would publicly try to refute my allegations, without the
courage to directly address my allegations.
“Talk about him, not to him?”
I’ll tell you why. They don’t want to engage in a discussion that will expose their guilt, and be humiliated by the truth
expressed by a man they deem to be a mentally ill, skinny little freak that is of no value other than to be used, abused and exploited as a means of profit for themselves.
Can anyone define a statement made by krunt that is absolute truth?
Nothing but lies.
Bring him to me!